Next year marks the 150th anniversary of the publication of Mendeleev’s Periodic Table of Chemical Elements.

 

Abstract.

This article sets out the views on the classification of all known chemical elements, those fundamental components of which the Earth and the entire Universe consists.
The innovation of this work is that in the table of elements constructed according to the Mendeleyev’s law and Van-den- Broek’s rule, new chemical elements with atomic numbers 72-75 and 108-111 are supposedly revealed, and also it is shown that for heavy elements starting with hafnium, the nuclei of atoms contain a larger number of protons than is generally accepted. Perhaps the mathematical apparatus of quantum mechanics missed some solutions because the atomic nucleus in calculations is taken as a point.
All cells in the table are full. If this table takes place, I would like to name groups of elements with the numbers 72-75 and 108-111, the islets of Filipenka Henadzi. https://fhenadzi.wordpress.com

It is said that the internal periodic electric field of the ions of the crystal lattice affects the distribution of electrons over the energy levels in solids. We make a rough calculation of the effect on the electron in the conduction band of the charge of the nucleus of the atom (ion) and the electron of the atomic core on the outer shell of the ion. Let the distance between atoms be 4 angstroms, and between the outer electron of the core and the conduction electron 0.25 angstrom, then we find an element with atomic number 64 whose charge of the nucleus affects the conduction electron with the same force as the outer electron of the core. Gadolinium. Hence we see that the effect on the conduction electron and the ion and electron on the outer shell of the atomic core is approximately the same in magnitude !!! Roughly, of course, nevertheless the band theory needs to be revised because of the presence of a more frequent periodic field of ions and external electrons of the atomic core. What is the role of the constant crystal lattice?
http://nauka-sn.ru/filestore/3(7)2018/FilipenkaH.R.pdf
Sincerely Henadzi Filipenka 

 

Dmitry Ivanovich built a table according to atomic weight, and he was right, because. atomic weight characterized the element completely, so to speak. This characteristic implicitly included both the periodicity and the charge of the nucleus. But someone collected the lanthanides after him in one line and placed them below the table. And Mendeleev had cerium after lanthanum. Now after lanthanum there is hafnium, and this is a gross mistake because, according to the atomic weight, it, hafnium, should be located on the line below. Elements 72-75 and 108-111 are omitted, starting with hafnium, the charges of the nuclei have changed.

After Mendeleev, the era of quantum mechanics began and its periodicity fit beautifully for many elements. Then it turned out that the main feature of the element is the charge of the nucleus. Before you is a table built according to the charges of the nuclei of atoms.

 

Has the periodic table of elements been proven to be absolutely correct, or correct with some exceptions?

for example, if we build a table according to the charges of the nuclei of atoms, then we get for the elements following after lutetium the charges of the nuclei increased by 4 units ... 72-75 and 108-111 elements not yet discovered.